Martha Stevenson v. Ethicon, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-02700,2:12-md-02327 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999965944].. [16-1621]
Appeal: 16-1621
Doc: 28
Filed: 11/10/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1621
MARTHA M. STEVENSON; JAMES STEVENSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
ETHICON, INCORPORATED; JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston.
Joseph R. Goodwin,
District Judge. (2:12-cv-02700; 2:12-md-02327)
Submitted:
November 4, 2016
Decided:
November 10, 2016
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tracy W. Houck, Ron Riggle,
Louisiana, for Appellants.
Higginbotham, THOMAS COMBS &
Virginia; Christy Jones, John
HOUCK & RIGGLE, LLC, Ruston,
David B. Thomas, Daniel R.
SPANN, PLLC, Charleston, West
C. Henegan, Sr., Susana Moore
Appeal: 16-1621
Doc: 28
Moldoveanu,
Appellees.
Filed: 11/10/2016
BUTLER
SNOW,
Pg: 2 of 3
LLP,
Ridgeland,
Mississippi,
for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-1621
Doc: 28
Filed: 11/10/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Martha M. Stevenson and James Stevenson appeal the district
court’s
orders
effect
dismissing
service
of
this
process
have
action
and
for
denying
reviewed
the
failure
their
record
to
timely
motion
and
find
for
reconsideration.
We
no
reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Stevenson v. Ethicon, Inc., Nos. 2:12-
cv-02700;
(S.D.
2016).
legal
before
2:12-md-02327
W.
Va.
Jan.
26,
2016;
May
27,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?