Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00235-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999961565]. Mailed to: Lawrence Wilder, Sr. [16-1622, 16-1623]

Appeal: 16-1622

Doc: 8

Filed: 11/03/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1622

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, US Attorney General; WILMINGTON NC POLICE;
FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE; PAM THORNTON, Federal Probation
Officer; FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE; DEBRA GRAVES,
Federal
Public
Defender;
JAMES
TODD,
Federal
Public
Defender; STEPHEN GORDON, Federal Public Defender; THOMAS
MCNAMARA, Federal Public Defender; FELICIA SARNER, Federal
Public Defender; TOBIN LATHAN, US Attorney; DAVID MEMEGER,
US Attorney; ROD ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney; THOMAS WALKER, US
Attorney; JENNIFER MAY-PARKER, US Attorney; BEN DAVID, New
Hanover County NC District Attorney; US DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE; US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; VIRGINIA STATE TROOPERS;
MALCOLM JONES HOWARD, Federal District Judge; ROBERT B.
JONES, Federal District Judge; LEGROME DAVIS, Federal
District Judge; TERRENCE BOYLE, Federal District Judge;
ELIZABETH HEY, Federal Magistrate Judge; DIANA MOTZ, Federal
Circuit Judge; JUDGE WYNN, Federal Circuit Judge; JUDGE
TRAXLER, Federal Circuit Chief Judge; JUDGE THACKER, Federal
Circuit Judge; JUDGE FLOYD, Federal Circuit Judge; JUDGE
SHEDD, Federal Circuit Judge; ANDRE DAVIS, Federal Circuit
Judge; UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS; UNKNOWN STATE AGENTS;
PROBATION OFFICER THORNTON, Federal Probation Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.

No. 16-1623

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,

Appeal: 16-1622

Doc: 8

Filed: 11/03/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILMINGTON, NC POLICE; NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC, SHERIFF’S
OFFICE; FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE; PAM THORNTON, Federal
Probation Officer; FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE; DEBRA
GRAVES, Federal Public Defender; JAMES TODD, Federal Public
Defender; STEPHEN GORDON, Federal Public Defender; THOMAS
MCNAMARA, Federal Public Defender; FELICIA SARNER, Federal
Public Defender; TOBIN LATHAN, US Attorney; DAVID MEMEGER,
US Attorney; ROD ROSENSTEIN, US Attorney; THOMAS WALKER, US
Attorney; JENNIFER MAY-PARKER, US Attorney; BEN DAVID, New
Hanover County NC District Attorney; US DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE; US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; VIRGINIA STATE TROOPERS;
MALCOLM JONES HOWARD, Federal District Judge; ROBERT B.
JONES, Federal District Judge; LEGROME DAVIS, Federal
District Judge; TERRENCE BOYLE, Federal District Judge;
ELIZABETH HEY, Federal Magistrate Judge; DIANA MOTZ, Federal
Circuit Judge; JUDGE WYNN, Federal Circuit Judge; JUDGE
TRAXLER, Federal Circuit Chief Judge; JUDGE THACKER, Federal
Circuit Judge; JUDGE FLOYD, Federal Circuit Judge; JUDGE
SHEDD, Federal Circuit Judge; ANDRE DAVIS, Federal Circuit
Judge; UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS; UNKNOWN STATE AGENTS;
PROBATION OFFICER THORNTON, Federal Probation Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (7:15-cv-00235-FL; 7:15-cv-00236-FL)

Submitted:

October 28, 2016

Decided:

November 3, 2016

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

Appeal: 16-1622

Doc: 8

Filed: 11/03/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order and judgments denying relief on his civil complaints.
district

court

referred

these

cases

to

a

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012).

magistrate

The
judge

The magistrate

judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Wilder that
failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could
waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.

Wright v.

Collins,

see

766

F.2d

841,

845-46

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
review
notice.

by

failing

to

file

(4th

Cir.

1985);

also

Wilder has waived appellate

objections

after

receiving

proper

Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the district

court.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions

are

adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3