In Re: William Hampton

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999840881-2]. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00464-CMH-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999939949]. Mailed to: William Hampton. [16-1624]

Appeal: 16-1624

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/03/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1624

In re:

WILLIAM DOUGLAS HAMPTON,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted:

September 29, 2016

(1:15-cv-00464-CMH-TCB)

Decided:

October 3, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Douglas Hampton, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1624

Doc: 11

Filed: 10/03/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
William Douglas Hampton petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has failed to comply with this
court’s mandate to transfer several motions to the docket of his
pending declaratory judgment action.

He seeks an order from

this court directing the district court to act.

Our review of

the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has
complied with the directions of our mandate.

See Hampton v.

Fed. Corr. Complex Petersburg, No. 1:15-cv-00318-CMH-TCB (E.D.
Va. Apr. 6, 2016).

Accordingly, because the district court has

already taken the action Hampton requests, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2