Don Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-04791-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999930716]. Mailed to: D Boyd. [16-1626]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1626 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1626 DON BOYD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BLUESTEIN, NICHOLS, THOMPSON AND DELGADO, LLC; JOHN S NICHOLS, (individually); STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; J EMORY SMITH, JR, (individually); KATHERINE BRADACS; TRACIE GOODWIN; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, (United States District Court for the District of South Carolina); UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-04791-JFA) Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Don Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1626 Doc: 7 Filed: 09/16/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Don Boyd appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation complaint against Defendants. discern no reversible dismiss Boyd’s civil We have reviewed the record and error. district court’s judgment. to Accordingly, we affirm the Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson & Delgado, LLC, No. 3:15-cv-04791-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2016). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?