Don Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-04791-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999930716]. Mailed to: D Boyd. [16-1626]
Appeal: 16-1626
Doc: 7
Filed: 09/16/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1626
DON BOYD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BLUESTEIN, NICHOLS, THOMPSON AND DELGADO, LLC; JOHN S
NICHOLS, (individually); STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; J EMORY
SMITH,
JR,
(individually);
KATHERINE
BRADACS;
TRACIE
GOODWIN; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, (United States
District Court for the District of South Carolina); UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, THE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (3:15-cv-04791-JFA)
Submitted:
September 13, 2016
Decided: September 16, 2016
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Don Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1626
Doc: 7
Filed: 09/16/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Don Boyd appeals the district court’s order adopting the
magistrate
judge’s
recommendation
complaint against Defendants.
discern
no
reversible
dismiss
Boyd’s
civil
We have reviewed the record and
error.
district court’s judgment.
to
Accordingly,
we
affirm
the
Boyd v. Bluestein, Nichols, Thompson
& Delgado, LLC, No. 3:15-cv-04791-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 31, 2016).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?