Barbara Curry v. Carolyn Colvin
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00698-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Barbara Curry. [16-1627]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BARBARA LINDSEY CURRY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Defendant – Appellee,
J. HEINBOCKEI; ADAM STEIFER; BRIAN M. RICCI; OFFICE
DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW; FIONA LAZIMI,
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00698-CCE-LPA)
March 14, 2017
Before FLOYD and
March 16, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barbara Lindsey Curry, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Drum, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Barbara Lindsey Curry appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
affirming the Social Security Administration’s decision to deny
Curry disability benefits.
On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R.
Because Curry’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Curry has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.
Accordingly, we affirm
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?