Barbara Curry v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00698-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000043299]. Mailed to: Barbara Curry. [16-1627]

Appeal: 16-1627

Doc: 17

Filed: 03/16/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1627

BARBARA LINDSEY CURRY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
ADMINISTRATION,

COMMISSIONER

OF

THE

SOCIAL

SECURITY

Defendant – Appellee,
and
J. HEINBOCKEI; ADAM STEIFER; BRIAN M. RICCI; OFFICE
DISABILITY ADJUDICATION AND REVIEW; FIONA LAZIMI,

OF

Defendants,
and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Party-in-Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00698-CCE-LPA)

Submitted:

March 14, 2017

Before FLOYD and
Circuit Judge.

HARRIS,

Decided:

Circuit

Judges,

and

March 16, 2017

DAVIS,

Senior

Appeal: 16-1627

Doc: 17

Filed: 03/16/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Lindsey Curry, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Drum, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1627

Doc: 17

Filed: 03/16/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Barbara Lindsey Curry appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
affirming the Social Security Administration’s decision to deny
Curry disability benefits.

On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).

See 4th Cir. R.

Because Curry’s informal brief does not challenge the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Curry has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3