Trudy Gaitwood v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999902719-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00807-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Trudy Gaitwood. [16-1640]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.; CITIBANK, N.A., as
trustee for structured asset mortgage investments II trust
2007-AR5 mortgage pass through certificates series 2007-AR5,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
August 25, 2016
August 29, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Trudy Gaitwood, Appellant Pro Se.
Sarah Reimers McIntee,
Raymond Gerard Mullady, Jr., NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH,
LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Trudy Gaitwood seeks to appeal the district court’s order
appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timely filed.
district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
April 26, 2016.
The notice of appeal was filed on May 31, 2016.
Because Gaitwood failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to
obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?