In re: Alexander Matthew

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999845138-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999845139-2]; denying Motion for judicial notice [999923378-3]; denying Motion to disqualify/recuse judge [999923378-2]. Originating case numbers: 1:11-cr-00087-LO-1, 1:11-cr-00348-LO-1, 1:12-cv-00132-LO Copies to all parties and the district court. [999948163]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [16-1643]

Appeal: 16-1643

Doc: 9

Filed: 10/17/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1643

In Re:

ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:11-cr-00087-LO-1; 1:11-cr-00348-LO-1; 1:12-cv-00132-LO)

Submitted:

October 13, 2016

Decided:

October 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1643

Doc: 9

Filed: 10/17/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Alexander

Matthews

petitions

for

a

writ

of

mandamus,

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion after remand.

He seeks an

order from this court directing the district court to act.
find

the

present

district court.
pauperism,

deny

record

does

not

reveal

undue

delay

in

We
the

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma
Matthews’

motion

for

notice, and deny the mandamus petition.

recusal

and

judicial

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2