Milo Shammas v. Michelle Lee
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01462-TSE-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. . [16-1656]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff – Appellant,
MICHELLE LEE, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-01462-TSE-TCB)
Submitted: March 23, 2017
Decided: March 31, 2017
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Steffin, Armin Azod, Century City, California, Mark Baker, STEFFIN AZOD
LLP, New York, New York; Carl E. Jennison, John N. Jennison, JENNISON &
SHULTZ, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Mark R. Freeman, Jaynie Lilley, Civil Division, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Nathan K. Kelley, Solicitor,
Thomas W. Krause, Deputy Solicitor, Christina J. Hieber, Thomas L. Casagrande,
Associate Solicitors, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Pg: 2 of 3
Alexandria, Virginia; Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Milo Shammas appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion for relief from a judgment awarding expenses in this trademark action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Shammas v. Lee, No. 1:12-cv-01462-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va.
May 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?