Joseph Vaughan, II v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:15-cv-00038-NKM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: appellants. [16-1665]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH F. VAUGHAN, II, f/k/a Joseph Vaughan; KATHERINE M.
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., f/k/a Wells Fargo; PREMIUM CAPITAL
FUNDING; SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
TRUST CO., f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Successor in Interest
to JP Morgan Chase Bank NA as Trustee for Bear Stearns Asset
Backed Securities Trust 2006-3, Asset Backed Certificates,
Series 2006-3; DOES 1-10,
Defendants – Appellees,
AMERICAN FEDERAL; FORD CONSUMER FINANCING; TRAVELERS MORTGAGE;
LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY; WASHINGTON MUTUAL,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg.
Norman K. Moon, Senior
District Judge. (6:15-cv-00038-NKM)
October 13, 2016
October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 3
Joseph F. Vaughan, II, Katherine M. Vaughan, Appellants Pro Se.
Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A..
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Joseph F. Vaughan, II, and Katherine M. Vaughan seek to appeal
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
The order the Vaughans seek to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?