Riying Wang v. Loretta Lynch


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A089-783-141. Copies to all parties and the agency. [1000000831]. Mailed to: Riying Wang. [16-1666]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1666 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/10/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1666 RIYING WANG, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: December 16, 2016 Decided: January 10, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Riying Wang, Petitioner Pro Se. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Briena L. Stippoli, Senior Litigation Counsel, Karen L. Melnik, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1666 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/10/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Riying Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Immigration Judge’s withholding Against (Board) of including the denial removal, Torture. We and have transcript supporting evidence. dismissing of of his his appeal requests for protection under thoroughly reviewed Wang’s merits from the the asylum, Convention the hearings record, and all We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see substantial 8 U.S.C. evidence § 1252(b)(4)(B) supports the (2012), Board’s and decision, INS that v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the reasons stated by the Board. 2016). legal before petition for review for the See In re Wang (B.I.A. May 16, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?