James Wooten, Jr. v. Martin Gruenberg
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00724-LO-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000035683]. [16-1667]
Appeal: 16-1667
Doc: 33
Filed: 03/06/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1667
JAMES L. WOOTEN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARTIN
Corp.,
J.
GRUENBERG,
Chairman,
Federal
Deposit
Insurance
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-00724-LO-TCB)
Submitted:
February 27, 2017
Decided:
March 6, 2017
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jennie Cathryne Blaine Watson, David H. Shapiro, SWICK &
SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Dana J. Boente,
United States Attorney, Ayana N. Free, Assistant United States
Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1667
Doc: 33
Filed: 03/06/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James L. Wooten, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Martin Gruenberg, Chairman
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, on Wooten’s race
discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2016).
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Wooten v.
Gruenberg, No. 1:15-cv-00724-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2016).
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?