James Wooten, Jr. v. Martin Gruenberg


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00724-LO-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000035683]. [16-1667]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1667 Doc: 33 Filed: 03/06/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1667 JAMES L. WOOTEN, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARTIN Corp., J. GRUENBERG, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00724-LO-TCB) Submitted: February 27, 2017 Decided: March 6, 2017 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jennie Cathryne Blaine Watson, David H. Shapiro, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Ayana N. Free, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1667 Doc: 33 Filed: 03/06/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James L. Wooten, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Martin Gruenberg, Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, on Wooten’s race discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2016). the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wooten v. Gruenberg, No. 1:15-cv-00724-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2016). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?