Jerry Ross v. J. D. Byrider Systems, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00596-MOC-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999930636]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-1671]

Appeal: 16-1671

Doc: 14

Filed: 09/16/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1671

JERRY LEE ROSS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
J. D. BYRIDER SYSTEMS, INC.; CNAC; SMART FINANCE, INC.;
SMART AUTO, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00596-MOC-DSC)

Submitted:

September 13, 2016

Decided: September 16, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Lee Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Caren D. Enloe, SMITH DEBNAM
NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1671

Doc: 14

Filed: 09/16/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jerry Lee Ross appeals the district court’s order accepting
the

magistrate

judge’s

recommendation

to

grant

Defendants’

motions to dismiss Ross’ civil claims against Defendants.
appeal,

we

Appellant’s

confine
brief.

our
See

review
4th

to

Cir.

the
R.

issues

raised

34(b).

in

Because

On
the

Ross’

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Ross has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order.

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423,

430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
court’s judgment.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

Accordingly, we affirm the district

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2