Lynton Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999971999]. Mailed to: L Ballentine. [16-1674]

Appeal: 16-1674

Doc: 18

Filed: 11/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1674

LYNTON BALLENTINE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JAMES B. NUTTER & COMPANY; HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, LP; JONATHAN
CALEB ROGERS; SHANN ROSE SCHMIDT; CLAIRE COLLINS; NORTH
CAROLINA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY; HOLLY ROBINSON; SURETY
INSURANCE COMPANY; KAREN BUMGARDNER,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC)

Submitted:

November 17, 2016

Before GREGORY,
Judges.

Chief

Judge,

Decided:

and

MOTZ

November 21, 2016

and

TRAXLER,

Circuit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynton Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se. Brian D.
BIRD, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Lacey
HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina;
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh,
Elizabeth C. Stone, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Raleigh,
for Appellees.

Boone, ALSTON &
Meredith Moore,
Kacy Lynn Hunt,
North Carolina;
North Carolina,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1674

Doc: 18

Filed: 11/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Lynton

Ballentine

dismissing

his

appeals

complaint

jurisdiction.

We

reversible error.

have

the

for

reviewed

district

lack
the

of

court’s
subject

record

and

order
matter

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.

Ballentine v. James B. Nutter & Co., No.

3:15-cv-00496-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2016).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2