Reginald Evans v. Cheryl M. Stanton


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-01585-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999948122]. Mailed to: Reginald Evans #123 1200 Broad Street Sumter, SC 29150. [16-1710]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1710 Doc: 5 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1710 REGINALD EVANS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CHERYL M. STANTON, Executive Director of South Department of Employment and Workforce (DEW), Carolina Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-01585-JFA) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1710 Doc: 5 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Reginald Evans appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. be denied and The magistrate judge recommended that relief advised Evans that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007). has waived objections appellate after review receiving by proper failing to notice. file Evans specific Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?