Doran Bowers v. Rory Perry

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999951509-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [999924295-2], denying Motion to amend/correct [999919219-2]; denying Motion to recuse clerk of court[999910201-2], denying Motion to correct docket [999901639-2] Originating case number: 2:14-cv-27242 Copies to all parties and the district court. [999972105]. Mailed to: Doran Bowers. [16-1713]

Appeal: 16-1713

Doc: 35

Filed: 11/21/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1713

DORAN BOWERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RORY PERRY; ROBIN DAVIS; BRENT BENJAMIN; MARGARET WORKMAN;
MENIS KETCHUM; ALLEN LOUGHRY; THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA;
GREGORY HILTON; PETER KRAUSER; ALEXANDER WRIGHT; ALBERT
MATRICCIANI; CHARLES MOYLAN; LAWRENCE RODOWSKY; ROBERT BELL;
MARY ELLEN BARBERA; GLEN HARELL; LYNNE BATTAGLIA; CLAYTON
GREENE; SALLY ATKINS; ROBERT MCDONALD; SHIRLEY WATTS, and;
THE STATE OF MARYLAND; KATTHLEEN COX,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston.
Joseph R. Goodwin,
District Judge. (2:14-cv-27242)

Submitted:

November 17, 2016

Before GREGORY,
Judges.

Chief

Judge,

Decided:

and

MOTZ

and

November 21, 2016

TRAXLER,

Circuit

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doran Bowers, Appellant Pro Se.
Teresa Jean Lyons, HEDGES &
LYONS, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia; Michele J. McDonald,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1713

Doc: 35

Filed: 11/21/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Doran Bowers appeals the district court’s orders adopting
the

magistrate

judge’s

recommendation

and

dismissing

with

prejudice Bowers’ civil action, and denying Bowers’ Fed. R. Civ.
P.

59(e)

motion

to

alter

or

amend

that

judgment.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See

Bowers v. Perry, No. 2:14-cv-27242 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 28, 2015 &
June 16, 2016).

We deny Bowers’ motions to correct the docket,

to recuse the Clerk of Court, and to amend or correct prior
orders entered by the Clerk.

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2