In re: Wellesley Clayton


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999912297-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999958382-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999956591-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00018-RJC,15-30573 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999976692]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-1714]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1714 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1714 In re: WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON, -----------------------------WELLESLEY K. CLAYTON, Debtor - Appellant, v. M&T BANK, Creditor – Appellee, and A. BURTON SHUFORD, Trustee – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. November 29, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Appeal: 16-1714 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Wellesley K. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. Lacey Meredith Moore, HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North Carolina; Allen Burton Shuford, Mint Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1714 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Wellesley denying K. his Clayton motion appeals for the district reconsideration of court’s order prior order a dismissing as untimely his appeal from the bankruptcy court. have reviewed the record Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm court. we we for and grant the find no reversible leave to proceed reasons stated by error. in the We forma district Clayton v. M&T Bank, Nos. 3:16-cv-00018-RJC; 15-30573 (W.D.N.C. appointment May of 24, 2016). counsel and We we deny Clayton’s dispense with motion oral for argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?