Tawan Cooper v. Pamela Varouxis
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00025-CMH-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Tawana Jean Cooper. [16-1723]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TAWANA JEAN COOPER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
PAMELA A. VAROUXIS, Executrix and Trustee of the Theodore
Varouxis Estate and Trust; JOHN T. FREY, Clerk of the
Circuit Court, Fairfax County, individually and in his
official capacity; NELSON L. KNOTT, Comptroller of the
Circuit Court, Fairfax County Virginia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00025-CMH-TCB)
October 13, 2016
October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tawana Jean Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arthur Sottolano,
CHADWICK WASHINGTON MORIARTY ELMORE & BUNN PC, Glen Allen,
Virginia; Alexander Francuzenko, Philip Corliss Krone, COOK
CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
regarding a property issue and denying her postjudgment motions
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *
v. Varouxis, No. 1:16-cv-00025-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. filed May 16 &
entered May 17, 2016; June 14 & 17, 2016).
We dispense with
argument would not aid the decisional process.
To the extent that Cooper seeks damages because she
believes that the Defendants committed fraud upon the state
court, however, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not bar her
See Great W. Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild
LLP, 615 F.3d 159, 172-73 (3d Cir. 2010) (holding that
Rooker-Feldman doctrine did not deprive district court of
jurisdiction in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action alleging that
plaintiff’s losses in state court action resulted from a
conspiracy between the defendants and certain members of the
Nonetheless, the district court correctly
dismissed those claims for failure to state a claim.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?