Mayner Pope v. Alicia Guns

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to supplement [999894933-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-02422-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999992577]. Mailed to: Mayner J. Pope. [16-1729]

Appeal: 16-1729

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1729

MS. MAYNER J. POPE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. ALICIA GUNS, Manager, Member Relations;
ALLIANCE, INC.; MR. KENNETH GREGORY GIVENS,

AAA

CLUB

Defendants - Appellees,
v.
MR. GREG GIVENS, Damage Assessor, Member Relations; AMERICAN
AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION MID-ATLANTIC, INC.,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:15-cv-02422-JFM)

Submitted:

December 20, 2016

Before GREGORY,
Judges.

Chief

Judge,

Decided:

and

WYNN,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

and

December 22, 2016

FLOYD,

Circuit

Appeal: 16-1729

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Mayner J. Pope, Appellant Pro Se.
OFFICES OF FRANK F. DAILY, PA,
Appellees.

Frank Furst Daily, III, LAW
Hunt Valley, Maryland, for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1729

Doc: 19

Filed: 12/22/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Mayner J. Pope appeals the district court’s order granting
the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Pope cannot prevail on

her 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2012) claims, as she has failed to provide
evidence
Pope’s
there

that

state
is

her
law

contractual
negligence

diversity

between

rights

claim,
the

were

impacted.

although

parties,

we

it

As

appears

agree

with

to

that
the

district court’s conclusion that it lacks original jurisdiction
based

on

the

amount

in

controversy.

Further,

the

district

court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
this

claim

is

within

that

court’s

discretion.

28

U.S.C.

§ 1367(c) (2012).
Accordingly, we deny Pope’s motion to supplement the record
and affirm the district court’s order.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3