Stephen Earl v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00115-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . [16-1734]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
UNITED STATES V.A.; SLOAN D. GIBSON, Acting Secretary of
V.A.; JAMES CRANDELL, VA Employee; DENNIS MCCLAINE, VA
Employee; LONNIE HATTON, VA Employee; JOE SOVATOS, VA
Employee; E. DOUGLAS BRADSHAW, JR., VA Employee; TISHA
BALKNELL, VA Employee,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00115-F)
February 23, 2017
February 27, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 3
Cedric R. Perry, PERRY & ASSOCIATES, Rocky Mount, North
Carolina, for Appellant.
John Stuart Bruce, United States
Attorney, G. Norman Acker, III, Kimberly A. Moore, Assistant
United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Stephen Earl appeals the district court’s order granting
Federal Tort Claims Act.
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Earl v. United States, No. 5:14-
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?