Raymond Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999917600-2], denying Motion to impose sanctions [999911343-2]; denying Motion to show cause [999917600-3]; denying Motion for other relief [999907853-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989327]. Mailed to: Raymond Johnson. [16-1740]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1740 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1740 RAYMOND A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEITH HAWTHORNE HYUNDAI; MCKENNEY CADILLAC CHEVROLET INC.; MCKENNEY HONDA, Defendants – Appellees, and EEOC CHARLOTTE DISTRICT OFFICE; RUBEN DANIELS, JR.; MCKENNEY HONDA R&S SALES INC., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Faith Hiser, Amy Yager Jenkins, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Mount Pleasant, South Appeal: 16-1740 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Carolina; Michael L. Carpenter, GRAY, LAYTON, KERSH, SOLOMON, FURR & SMITH, PA, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-1740 Doc: 29 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Raymond A. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint, ordering him to pay monetary sanctions, and imposing a prefiling injunction. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai, No. 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2016 & June 27, 2016). We deny Johnson’s motions to recuse opposing counsel and for sanctions, and we deny the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?