Raymond Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999917600-2], denying Motion to impose sanctions [999911343-2]; denying Motion to show cause [999917600-3]; denying Motion for other relief [999907853-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989327]. Mailed to: Raymond Johnson. [16-1740]

Appeal: 16-1740

Doc: 29

Filed: 12/19/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1740

RAYMOND A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEITH HAWTHORNE HYUNDAI; MCKENNEY CADILLAC CHEVROLET INC.;
MCKENNEY HONDA,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
EEOC CHARLOTTE DISTRICT OFFICE; RUBEN DANIELS, JR.; MCKENNEY
HONDA R&S SALES INC.,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC)

Submitted:

December 15, 2016

Decided:

December 19, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Faith Hiser, Amy Yager
Jenkins, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Mount Pleasant, South

Appeal: 16-1740

Doc: 29

Filed: 12/19/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Carolina; Michael L. Carpenter, GRAY, LAYTON, KERSH, SOLOMON, FURR
& SMITH, PA, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1740

Doc: 29

Filed: 12/19/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Raymond

A.

Johnson

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders

dismissing his civil complaint, ordering him to pay monetary
sanctions, and imposing a prefiling injunction.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

Johnson v. Keith

Hawthorne Hyundai, No. 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3,
2016 & June 27, 2016).

We deny Johnson’s motions to recuse

opposing counsel and for sanctions, and we deny the Appellees’
motion for sanctions.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3