Raymond Johnson v. Keith Hawthorne Hyundai
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to impose sanctions [999917600-2], denying Motion to impose sanctions [999911343-2]; denying Motion to show cause [999917600-3]; denying Motion for other relief [999907853-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Raymond Johnson. [16-1740]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RAYMOND A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
KEITH HAWTHORNE HYUNDAI; MCKENNEY CADILLAC CHEVROLET INC.;
Defendants – Appellees,
EEOC CHARLOTTE DISTRICT OFFICE; RUBEN DANIELS, JR.; MCKENNEY
HONDA R&S SALES INC.,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC)
December 15, 2016
December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Faith Hiser, Amy Yager
Jenkins, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Mount Pleasant, South
Pg: 2 of 3
Carolina; Michael L. Carpenter, GRAY, LAYTON, KERSH, SOLOMON, FURR
& SMITH, PA, Gastonia, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
dismissing his civil complaint, ordering him to pay monetary
sanctions, and imposing a prefiling injunction.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Johnson v. Keith
Hawthorne Hyundai, No. 3:15-cv-00148-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3,
2016 & June 27, 2016).
We deny Johnson’s motions to recuse
opposing counsel and for sanctions, and we deny the Appellees’
motion for sanctions.
We dispense with oral argument because the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?