In re: Kenneth Pegram

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999893888-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999880534-2]. Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00110-WO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999927907]. Mailed to: Kenneth Pegram. [16-1745]

Appeal: 16-1745

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/13/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1745

In Re:

KENNETH LANE PEGRAM,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:08-cr-00110-WO-1)

Submitted:

August 26, 2016

Decided:

September 13, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Lane Pegram, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1745

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/13/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kenneth

Lane

Pegram

petitions

this

Court

for

a

writ

of

mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to rule
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.

District court records

disclose that the district court entered an opinion and order
denying Pegram’s § 2255 motion on August 5, 2016.
district

court

has

acted

mandamus petition as moot.

on

Pegram’s

motion,

Because the
we

deny

the

We grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before

contentions
the

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
PETITION DENIED

2