In re: Mark Busack

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999882148-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999891540-2]. Originating case numbers: 5:14-cr-00054-FPS-JES-1, 5:15-cv-00151-FPS-JES. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999971871]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [16-1754]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1754 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1754 In re: MARK C. BUSACK, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (5:14-cr-00054-FPS-JES-1, 5:15-cv-00151-FPS-JES) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Before GREGORY, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: and MOTZ and November 21, 2016 TRAXLER, Circuit Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark C. Busack, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1754 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mark C. Busack petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. we grant leave to mandamus petition. facts and materials legal before proceed in forma pauperis Accordingly, and deny the We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?