Joseph Lambert v. Mecklenburg County

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00577-GCM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999971991]. Mailed to: Joseph Lambert. [16-1755]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1755 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1755 JOSEPH B. LAMBERT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY; DENA DIORIO; CHRIS PEEK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00577-GCM) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Before GREGORY, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: and MOTZ and November 21, 2016 TRAXLER, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph B. Lambert, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Rainey, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1755 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph B. Lambert appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Lambert’s motion to amend his complaint as futile. record and find no reversible error. the reasons stated by the We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for district court. Lambert v. Mecklenburg Cty., No. 3:15-cv-00577-GCM (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2016). We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?