Joseph Lambert v. Mecklenburg County
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00577-GCM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999971991]. Mailed to: Joseph Lambert. [16-1755]
Appeal: 16-1755
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1755
JOSEPH B. LAMBERT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY; DENA DIORIO; CHRIS PEEK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00577-GCM)
Submitted:
November 17, 2016
Before GREGORY,
Judges.
Chief
Judge,
Decided:
and
MOTZ
and
November 21, 2016
TRAXLER,
Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph B. Lambert, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Rainey, WOMBLE
CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1755
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph
B.
Lambert
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Lambert’s
motion to amend his complaint as futile.
record and find no reversible error.
the
reasons
stated
by
the
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
district
court.
Lambert
v.
Mecklenburg Cty., No. 3:15-cv-00577-GCM (W.D.N.C. June 2, 2016).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?