Bruce Dillard v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999892533-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00009-GMG-MJA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999975626].. [16-1756]

Appeal: 16-1756

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/28/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1756

BRUCE ANTHONY DILLARD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CHARLES E.
Prisons,

SAMUELS,

JR.,

Director

of

Federal

Bureau

of

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:16-cv-00009-GMG-MJA)

Submitted:

November 18, 2016

Decided:

November 28, 2016

Before DUNCAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Anthony Dillard, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Carter Tison,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.

Appeal: 16-1756

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/28/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1756

Doc: 7

Filed: 11/28/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Bruce Anthony Dillard appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge dismissing
Dillard’s complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1).
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Dillard v.

United States, No. 3:16-cv-00009-GMG-MJA (N.D. W. Va. June 22,
2016).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

3