Tamera Etheridge v. City of Roanoke Rapid


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00089-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000035676].. [16-1764]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1764 Doc: 24 Filed: 03/06/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1764 TAMERA L. ETHERIDGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF ROANOKE RAPIDS; JOSEPH SCHERER, in his Official Capacity as City Manager; JOHN SIMEON, in his Official and Individual Capacity as Director, Parks and Recreations; CHRISTINA COKER, in her Official and Individual Capacity as Aquatics Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:15-cv-00089-BO) Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 6, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony James Cuticchia, Jr., AJC LEGAL SERVICES, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Torin L. Fury, William L. Hill, FRAZIER HILL & FURY, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1764 Doc: 24 Filed: 03/06/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tamera L. Etheridge appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for insufficient process, insufficient service of process, and lack of personal jurisdiction. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the Etheridge v. (E.D.N.C. filed dispense with contentions City are May oral reasons of 27, stated argument adequately Accordingly, & by the district Rapids, Roanoke 2016 We have No. 4:15-cv-00089-BO May 31, 2016). facts and legal materials before entered because presented in the the court. We this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?