Tamera Etheridge v. City of Roanoke Rapid
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:15-cv-00089-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000035676].. [16-1764]
Appeal: 16-1764
Doc: 24
Filed: 03/06/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1764
TAMERA L. ETHERIDGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ROANOKE RAPIDS; JOSEPH SCHERER, in his Official
Capacity as City Manager; JOHN SIMEON, in his Official and
Individual Capacity as Director, Parks and Recreations;
CHRISTINA COKER, in her Official and Individual Capacity as
Aquatics Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:15-cv-00089-BO)
Submitted:
February 28, 2017
Decided:
March 6, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony James Cuticchia, Jr., AJC LEGAL SERVICES, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant.
Torin L. Fury, William L. Hill,
FRAZIER HILL & FURY, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1764
Doc: 24
Filed: 03/06/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tamera
L.
Etheridge
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing her complaint for insufficient process, insufficient
service of process, and lack of personal jurisdiction.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
the
Etheridge
v.
(E.D.N.C.
filed
dispense
with
contentions
City
are
May
oral
reasons
of
27,
stated
argument
adequately
Accordingly,
&
by
the
district
Rapids,
Roanoke
2016
We have
No.
4:15-cv-00089-BO
May
31,
2016).
facts
and
legal
materials
before
entered
because
presented
in
the
the
court.
We
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?