Cynthia Roseberry-Andrews v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc.
Filing
OPINION/ORDER DIRECTING LIMITED REMAND [4CCA retains jurisdiction]. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01503-GJH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Mark J. Strong. [999989473] [16-1771]
Appeal: 16-1771
Doc: 19
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1771
CYNTHIA ROSEBERRY-ANDREWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCHELL & KAMPETER, INC.,
DIAMOND PET FOODS, INC.,
d/b/a
Diamond
Pet
Foods,
Inc.;
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-01503-GJH)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cynthia Roseberry-Andrews, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark J. Strong,
LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN P. STEBENNE, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1771
Doc: 19
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia
court’s
Roseberry-Andrews
order
dismissing
seeks
her
to
appeal
complaint
the
without
district
prejudice.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district
court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App.
P.
4(a)(1)(A),
unless
the
district
court
extends
the
appeal
period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal
period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May
2, 2016.
The notice of appeal was filed on July 1, 2016.
On
September 19, 2016, the Appellees filed a motion to dismiss the
appeal.
On September 26, 2016, Roseberry-Andrews filed a motion
in the district court to enlarge the appeal period.
Because
that motion remains pending, we remand this case to the district
court
for
the
limited
purpose
of
deciding
the
motion.
The
record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for
further consideration.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
REMANDED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?