Timothy Davis v. Universal Composition Service
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00036-CMH-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-1775]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY E. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendants – Appellees,
UNIVERSAL COMPOSITION SERVICES, LLC; ALTAF U. KHAN,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00036-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 12, 2017
Before SHEDD and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard E. Goodman, David Ludwig, DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG, PLLC,
Vienna, Virginia; Roger C. Simmons, Shawn P. Cavenee, Christopher F. deBettencourt,
GORDON & SIMMONS, LLC, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Mary C. Zinsner, S.
Pg: 2 of 3
Mohsin Reza, TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Allison Melton,
TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lisa Hudson Kim, SAMUEL I.
WHITE, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Timothy E. Davis appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his amended
complaint in which he raised numerous claims arising out of the foreclosure on his
property. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs,
and find no error in the district court’s dismissal of Davis’ claims. Specifically, we find
no merit to Davis’ claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract under
Virginia law; nor do we find an actionable claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (2012). Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Davis v. Samuel I. White, P.C., No. 1:16-cv-00036-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. June 10,
2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?