Richard Coleman v. State of North Carolina
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00035-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999982985]. Mailed to: Richard Coleman. [16-1789]
Appeal: 16-1789
Doc: 5
Filed: 12/08/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1789
RICHARD COLEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, and its Agents; ELAINE BUSHFAN, in
their official capacity; JENNIFER GREEN, in their official
capacity; M. P. EAGLES, in their official capacity; DONALD
STEPHENS, in their official capacity; GREGORY P. MCGUIRE, in
their official capacity; NANCY FREEMAN, in their official
capacity; JOHN H. CONNELL, in their official capacity; KAY
SILVER, a/k/a Kay Shannon, a/k/a Silver, a/k/a Kay S. Coleman,
a/k/a Kay Shannon Atkinson, a/k/a Kay Shannon Anthony, a/k/a
K. S. Atkinson, in their official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.
James C. Dever
III, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00035-D)
Submitted:
November 29, 2016
Decided:
December 8, 2016
Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1789
Doc: 5
Filed: 12/08/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Richard
Coleman
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
and
judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing
his
complaint
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012).
as
frivolous
under
28
U.S.C.
We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Coleman v. North Carolina, No. 2:15-cv-
00035-D (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?