Jerry Bowman v. Bank of America, NA
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999911394-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cv-03436-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000026748]. Mailed to: Bowan. [16-1802]
Appeal: 16-1802
Doc: 24
Filed: 02/21/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1802
JERRY BOWMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA NA, d/b/a Bank of America Home Loans,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (3:13-cv-03436-TLW)
Submitted:
February 16, 2017
Decided:
February 21, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Bowman, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert Ashley Muckenfuss,
Elizabeth
Marion
Zwickert
Timmermans,
MCGUIREWOODS,
LLP,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1802
Doc: 24
Filed: 02/21/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Bowman appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his civil action in which he claimed the Defendant
discriminated
against
him
based
on
his
disability
while
considering him for a mortgage loan modification under the Home
Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), and denying his motion for
reconsideration.
reversible error.
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
Accordingly, although we grant Bowman leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
See Bowman v. Bank of Am. NA, No. 3:13–cv–03436–
TLW (D.S.C. June 16, 2016 & Oct. 13, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?