Jerry Bowman v. Bank of America, NA


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999911394-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cv-03436-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000026748]. Mailed to: Bowan. [16-1802]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1802 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/21/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1802 JERRY BOWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA NA, d/b/a Bank of America Home Loans, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-03436-TLW) Submitted: February 16, 2017 Decided: February 21, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ashley Muckenfuss, Elizabeth Marion Zwickert Timmermans, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1802 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/21/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Bowman appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his civil action in which he claimed the Defendant discriminated against him based on his disability while considering him for a mortgage loan modification under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), and denying his motion for reconsideration. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, although we grant Bowman leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bowman v. Bank of Am. NA, No. 3:13–cv–03436– TLW (D.S.C. June 16, 2016 & Oct. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?