Robert Zander v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00700-WO-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999976643]. Mailed to: Robert Zander. [16-1803]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1803 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1803 ROBERT A. ZANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:12-cv-00700-WO-JEP) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert A. Zander, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Childs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1803 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert A. Zander appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on Zander’s action filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. Zander also appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting the Government’s motion for a protective order. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Zander v. United States, No. 1:12-cv- 00700-WO-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2015; Mar. 31, 2016; July 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?