Daniel Ross v. Maryland State Police

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999906864-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01402-TDC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999976871]. Mailed to: Daniel Hubert Ross 11085 Commanders Lane White Plains, MD 20695. [16-1809]

Appeal: 16-1809

Doc: 14

Filed: 11/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1809

DANIEL HUBERT ROSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND STATE POLICE LICENSING DIVISION,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-01402-TDC)

Submitted:

November 22, 2016

Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

November 29, 2016

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Hubert Ross, Appellant Pro Se.
Mark Holdsworth Bowen,
Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1809

Doc: 14

Filed: 11/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Daniel

Hubert

Ross

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders

granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Ross leave to
amend his complaint.
reversible

error.

We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly,

we

deny

leave

to

proceed

in

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.

Ross v. Md. State Police Licensing Div.,

No. 8:15-cv-01402-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2016 & June 28, 2016).
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2