John Stritzinger v. Samuel Asiedu

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999917556-2]; denying Motion for leave to file [999918356-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999931186-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-05111-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999976849]. Mailed to: J Stritzinger. [16-1810]

Appeal: 16-1810

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1810

JOHN S. STRITZINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SAMUEL ASIEDU; SCOTT MATOSCO; SUSAN ZELENIAK,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (3:15-cv-05111-TLW)

Submitted:

November 22, 2016

Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

November 29, 2016

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1810

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John

S.

Stritzinger

appeals

accepting

the

recommendation

dismissing

his

complaint

have

for

reviewed

of

the

district

the

failing

the

magistrate
to

record

court’s

comply

and

judge

with

find

order

no

a

and
court

order.

We

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, deny Stritzinger’s pending motions, and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Asiedu,
dispense

No.

3:15-cv-05111-TLW

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

Stritzinger v.

(D.S.C.

June

23,

2016).

because

the

facts

and

legal

materials

before

presented

in

the

We

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2