Marguerite E. Edwards v. Thomas J. Vilsak

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01823-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939770]. Mailed to: Marguerite E. Edwards P. O. Box 480241 Charlotte, NC 28201. [16-1811]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1811 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1811 MARGUERITE E. EDWARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS J. VILSAK, Secretary US Department Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, of Agriculture Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-01823-DKC) Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marguerite E. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jakarra Jenise Jones, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1811 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/03/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Marguerite E. Edwards appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in her civil action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to Employment 2000e-17 Act of (2012), 1967, (West 2008 & Supp. 2016). no reversible error. stated by the as and the amended, Age 29 Discrimination U.S.C.A. argument adequately Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons district because presented §§ 621-34 We have reviewed the record and find court. Edwards No. 8:15-cv-01823-DKC (D. Md. July 7, 2016). oral in in the the facts and materials legal before v. Vilsak, We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?