Marguerite E. Edwards v. Thomas J. Vilsak
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01823-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999939770]. Mailed to: Marguerite E. Edwards P. O. Box 480241 Charlotte, NC 28201. [16-1811]
Appeal: 16-1811
Doc: 7
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1811
MARGUERITE E. EDWARDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS J. VILSAK, Secretary US Department
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,
of Agriculture
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:15-cv-01823-DKC)
Submitted:
September 29, 2016
Decided:
October 3, 2016
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marguerite E. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se.
Jane Elizabeth
Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jakarra Jenise
Jones, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1811
Doc: 7
Filed: 10/03/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Marguerite E. Edwards appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant in her civil action under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e
to
Employment
2000e-17
Act
of
(2012),
1967,
(West 2008 & Supp. 2016).
no reversible error.
stated
by
the
as
and
the
amended,
Age
29
Discrimination
U.S.C.A.
argument
adequately
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
district
because
presented
§§ 621-34
We have reviewed the record and find
court.
Edwards
No. 8:15-cv-01823-DKC (D. Md. July 7, 2016).
oral
in
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
v.
Vilsak,
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?