In Re: Tara Singhal
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999900279-2]. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00708-CMH-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Tara Singhal. [16-1818]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: TARA CHAND SINGHAL,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
December 6, 2016
December 21, 2016
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tara Chand Singhal, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Tara Chand Singhal filed a petition for a writ of mandamus,
granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in this
action; and (2) transfer of the action to a different district
We deny the petition.
Mandamus is a drastic remedy that should be used only in
Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S.
petitioner has demonstrated a clear right to the relief sought.
In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.
Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal.
re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
Because Singhal has not made the requisite showing, we deny
the mandamus petition.
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?