Kathleen DeWeese v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-16210 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989562].. [16-1843]
Appeal: 16-1843
Doc: 25
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1843
KATHLEEN DEWEESE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington.
Robert C. Chambers,
Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-16210)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hoyt Eric Glazer, LAW OFFICE
Virginia, for Appellant.
Attorney, Jennifer M. Mankins,
Charleston, West Virginia, for
OF HOYT GLAZER, Huntington, West
Carol A. Casto, United States
Assistant United States Attorney,
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1843
Doc: 25
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen
DeWeese
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting Carolyn W. Colvin’s motion to dismiss DeWeese’s claims,
brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp.
2016);
the
Age
Discrimination
in
Employment
Act
of
1967,
as
amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); and
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701
to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016).
and
find
no
reversible
district court’s judgment.
16210
(S.D.W.
Va.
June
error.
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly,
we
affirm
the
See DeWeese v. Colvin, No. 3:15-cv24,
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?