Kathleen DeWeese v. Carolyn Colvin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-16210 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989562].. [16-1843]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1843 Doc: 25 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1843 KATHLEEN DEWEESE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-16210) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hoyt Eric Glazer, LAW OFFICE Virginia, for Appellant. Attorney, Jennifer M. Mankins, Charleston, West Virginia, for OF HOYT GLAZER, Huntington, West Carol A. Casto, United States Assistant United States Attorney, Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1843 Doc: 25 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kathleen DeWeese appeals the district court’s order granting Carolyn W. Colvin’s motion to dismiss DeWeese’s claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016); and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701 to 796l (West 2008 & Supp. 2016). and find no reversible district court’s judgment. 16210 (S.D.W. Va. June error. We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm the See DeWeese v. Colvin, No. 3:15-cv24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?