Gloria Williams v. Jerry Tillett
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00038-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999948073]. Mailed to: Gloria Dean Williams. [16-1845]
Appeal: 16-1845
Doc: 5
Filed: 10/17/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1845
GLORIA DEAN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JERRY R. TILLETT, individually, and in his official capacity
as Senior Resident Superior Court Judge District 1, North
Carolina; JOSEPH H. FORBES, JR., Esquire,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City.
James C. Dever
III, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00038-D)
Submitted:
October 13, 2016
Decided:
October 17, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gloria Dean Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr.,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ronald
Graham Baker, SHARP, MICHAEL, GRAHAM & BAKER, LLP, Kitty Hawk,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1845
Doc: 5
Filed: 10/17/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gloria
dismissing
Dean
her
jurisdiction.
Williams
civil
appeals
action
for
the
district
lack
of
court’s
subject
order
matter
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because
Williams’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district court’s disposition, Williams has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order.
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370
F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?