Gloria Williams v. Jerry Tillett

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00038-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999948073]. Mailed to: Gloria Dean Williams. [16-1845]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1845 Doc: 5 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1845 GLORIA DEAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JERRY R. TILLETT, individually, and in his official capacity as Senior Resident Superior Court Judge District 1, North Carolina; JOSEPH H. FORBES, JR., Esquire, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00038-D) Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gloria Dean Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ronald Graham Baker, SHARP, MICHAEL, GRAHAM & BAKER, LLP, Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1845 Doc: 5 Filed: 10/17/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gloria dismissing Dean her jurisdiction. Williams civil appeals action for the district lack of court’s subject order matter On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Williams’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Williams has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?