In re: Steven Prentice
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999897734-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00179-CCE-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000015720]. Mailed to: Steven Prentice. [16-1851]
Appeal: 16-1851
Doc: 16
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1851
In re:
STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
(1:16-cv-00179-CCE-JEP)
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam.
Steven Dixon Prentice, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1851
Doc: 16
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Dixon Prentice petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his “Demand for Release” in connection with his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition.
The district court’s docket sheet reveals that
the court dismissed without prejudice Prentice’s § 2241 petition
on
May
27,
petition.
legal
before
2016.
Accordingly,
we
deny
Prentice’s
mandamus
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?