Jitendrakumar Patel v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A089-414-107. Copies to all parties and the agency. [1000021336].. [16-1858]
Appeal: 16-1858
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/10/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1858
JITENDRAKUMAR JAGUBHAI PATEL,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
January 20, 2017
Decided:
February 10, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit
Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gene S. Devore, LAW OFFICES OF GENE S. DEVORE, P.A., West Palm
Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant
Director, Sarah A. Byrd, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1858
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/10/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jitendrakumar
India,
petitions
Jagubhai
for
Patel,
review
of
a
an
native
order
and
of
citizen
the
Board
Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen.
of
of
We
have reviewed the administrative record and Patel’s claims, and
conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
his motion.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey,
552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009).
Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
re Patel (B.I.A. June 30, 2016).
See In
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?