Jitendrakumar Patel v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A089-414-107. Copies to all parties and the agency. [1000021336].. [16-1858]

Appeal: 16-1858

Doc: 30

Filed: 02/10/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1858

JITENDRAKUMAR JAGUBHAI PATEL,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

January 20, 2017

Decided:

February 10, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit
Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gene S. Devore, LAW OFFICES OF GENE S. DEVORE, P.A., West Palm
Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant
Director, Sarah A. Byrd, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1858

Doc: 30

Filed: 02/10/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jitendrakumar
India,

petitions

Jagubhai
for

Patel,

review

of

a
an

native
order

and
of

citizen

the

Board

Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen.

of
of
We

have reviewed the administrative record and Patel’s claims, and
conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
his motion.

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey,

552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we deny the

petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
re Patel (B.I.A. June 30, 2016).

See In

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2