Jitendrakumar Patel v. Loretta Lynch


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A089-414-107. Copies to all parties and the agency. [1000021336].. [16-1858]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1858 Doc: 30 Filed: 02/10/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1858 JITENDRAKUMAR JAGUBHAI PATEL, Petitioner, v. JEFF SESSIONS, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: January 20, 2017 Decided: February 10, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gene S. Devore, LAW OFFICES OF GENE S. DEVORE, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Sarah A. Byrd, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1858 Doc: 30 Filed: 02/10/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jitendrakumar India, petitions Jagubhai for Patel, review of a an native order and of citizen the Board Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. of of We have reviewed the administrative record and Patel’s claims, and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. re Patel (B.I.A. June 30, 2016). See In We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?