Dione Thomas v. Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999912263-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00596-CMH-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000023149]. Mailed to: Dione M. Thomas. [16-1860]
Appeal: 16-1860
Doc: 27
Filed: 02/14/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1860
DIONE M. THOMAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SOTERA DEFENSE SOLUTION, INC.; SOTERA DEFENSE
INC.; JACOBS FEDERAL NETWORK SYSTEMS LLC,
SOLUTIONS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
FNS JACOBS; KENUANA ENGRAM; PATRICIA SHEA; VERNON SAUNDERS;
DEBORAH DRAKE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00596-CMH-MSN)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Before SHEDD and
Circuit Judge.
DUNCAN,
Decided:
Circuit
Judges,
February 14, 2017
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed in part; affirmed in part as modified by unpublished
per curiam opinion.
Dione M. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Lorraine
Thompson,
FORD
HARRISON
Anessa Abrams, Jacquelyn
LLP,
Washington,
D.C.;
Appeal: 16-1860
Doc: 27
Filed: 02/14/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Christopher Eric Humber, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART,
PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-1860
Doc: 27
Filed: 02/14/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Dione
granting
M.
Thomas
defendants’
appeals
motions
the
to
district
dismiss
her
court’s
orders
second
amended
complaint in this employment discrimination action.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly,
we affirm the dismissal of count I for the reasons stated by the
district court.
We likewise affirm the dismissal of count II,
but
to
as
modified
prejudice.
Thomas
reflect
v.
dismissal
Sotera
Defense
of
that
count
Solutions,
without
Inc.,
No.
1:15-cv-00596-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed July 19, 2016 & entered
July 20, 2016; July 27, 2016).
We grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED IN PART;
AFFIRMED IN PART AS MODIFIED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?