Raymond Key, Jr. v. Leslie Lilley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999910161-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999900278-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00130-AWA-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999971982]. Mailed to: Raymond J. Key Jr. 4014 Tanglewood Trail Chesapeake, VA 23325. [16-1863]
Appeal: 16-1863
Doc: 18
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1863
RAYMOND J. KEY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HONORABLE JUDGE LESLIE L. LILLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:16-cv-00130-AWA-RJK)
Submitted:
November 17, 2016
Decided:
November 21, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond J. Key, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1863
Doc: 18
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond J. Key, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Key v. Lilley, No. 2:16-cv-00130-
AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. June 30, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?