Raymond Key, Jr. v. Leslie Lilley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999910161-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999900278-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00130-AWA-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999971982]. Mailed to: Raymond J. Key Jr. 4014 Tanglewood Trail Chesapeake, VA 23325. [16-1863]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1863 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1863 RAYMOND J. KEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE JUDGE LESLIE L. LILLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00130-AWA-RJK) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond J. Key, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Foris Simopoulos, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1863 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Raymond J. Key, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Key v. Lilley, No. 2:16-cv-00130- AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?