Christopher Mossburg v. The State of Maryland

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999924669-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01633-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000025666]. Mailed to: Christopher Maddox Mossburg. [16-1869]

Appeal: 16-1869

Doc: 20

Filed: 02/17/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1869

CHRISTOPHER MADDOX MOSSBURG,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:15-cv-01633-RWT)

Submitted:

January 4, 2017

Decided:

February 17, 2017

Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Maddox Mossburg, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J.
McDonald, Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorneys General,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1869

Doc: 20

Filed: 02/17/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Christopher
order

dismissing

12(b)(6).
error.

Maddox
his

Mossburg

pursuant

complaint

the
to

district
Fed.

R.

court’s
Civ.

P.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,

we

affirm

for

the

reasons

court.

Mossburg

v.

Maryland,

June 29,

2016).

We

dispense

facts

appeals

and

materials

legal
before

No.
with

stated

the

8:15-cv-01633-RWT
oral

argument

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

by

(D.

Md.

because

the

presented

would

district

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2