Christopher Mossburg v. The State of Maryland


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999924669-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01633-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000025666]. Mailed to: Christopher Maddox Mossburg. [16-1869]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1869 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/17/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1869 CHRISTOPHER MADDOX MOSSBURG, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-01633-RWT) Submitted: January 4, 2017 Decided: February 17, 2017 Before TRAXLER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Maddox Mossburg, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J. McDonald, Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorneys General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1869 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/17/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher order dismissing 12(b)(6). error. Maddox his Mossburg pursuant complaint the to district Fed. R. court’s Civ. P. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons court. Mossburg v. Maryland, June 29, 2016). We dispense facts appeals and materials legal before No. with stated the 8:15-cv-01633-RWT oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court by (D. Md. because the presented would district not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?