Martin May v. RHA
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999919777-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00291-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: M May. [16-1870]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MARTIN L. MAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
RHA, Attn: John White-Chief Ethics Compliance Ofcr.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00291-MR-DLH)
March 30, 2017
April 18, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin L. May, Appellant Pro Se. Randall D. Avram, Jennifer Rasile
Everitt, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Martin L. May appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing May’s
employment discrimination action as time-barred.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we grant
May’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
00291-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. July 26, 2016).
May v. RHA, No. 1:15-cvWe dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?