Martin May v. RHA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999919777-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00291-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000063457]. Mailed to: M May. [16-1870]

Appeal: 16-1870

Doc: 11

Filed: 04/18/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1870

MARTIN L. MAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RHA, Attn: John White-Chief Ethics Compliance Ofcr.,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:15-cv-00291-MR-DLH)

Submitted:

March 30, 2017

Decided:

April 18, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin L. May, Appellant Pro Se. Randall D. Avram, Jennifer Rasile
Everitt, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1870

Doc: 11

Filed: 04/18/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Martin L. May appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing May’s
employment discrimination action as time-barred.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we grant

May’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
00291-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. July 26, 2016).

May v. RHA, No. 1:15-cvWe dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2