US v. Eugene Milford

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-02009-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000006253].. [16-1878]

Appeal: 16-1878

Doc: 17

Filed: 01/19/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1878

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EUGENE MILFORD,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-02009-RMG)

Submitted:

January 17, 2017

Decided:

January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1878

Doc: 17

Filed: 01/19/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eugene Milford appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
judgment to the United States on its complaint and on Milford’s
counterclaims.
reversible error.
by

the

district

We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
court.

United

States

2:15-cv-02009-RMG (D.S.C. July 28, 2016).

v.

Milford,

No.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2