US v. Eugene Milford


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-02009-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000006253].. [16-1878]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1878 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/19/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1878 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. EUGENE MILFORD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cv-02009-RMG) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1878 Doc: 17 Filed: 01/19/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Eugene Milford appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the United States on its complaint and on Milford’s counterclaims. reversible error. by the district We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated court. United States 2:15-cv-02009-RMG (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). v. Milford, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?