John Driscoll, III v. Sandra Forquer
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999904336-2]; granting Motion to dismiss appeal [999916635-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-02555-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: appellant. [16-1879]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOHN E. DRISCOLL, III; LAURA D. HARRIS; DANIEL J. PESACHOWITZ;
DEENA L. REYNOLDS, Substitute Trustee,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
SANDRA S. FORQUER,
Defendant – Appellant,
BARBARA S. FORQUER,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
November 22, 2016
November 29, 2016
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sandra S. Forquer, Appellant Pro Se.
Douglas Brooks Riley,
TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Sandra S. Forquer seeks to appeal the district court’s order
remanding this removed action to the state court for lack of
With certain exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n
order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed
is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.”
28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)
The Supreme Court has limited the scope of § 1447(d) to
prohibiting appellate review of remand orders based on a defect in
the removal procedure or lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711–12 (1996); see
28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012).
Here, the remand was based on lack of
jurisdiction to review the district court’s order.
Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?