Glenn Stewart v. Riverside Technology, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 15-0436 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000041849].. [16-1891]

Appeal: 16-1891

Doc: 46

Filed: 03/14/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1891

GLENN A. STEWART,
Petitioner,
v.
RIVERSIDE
TECHNOLOGY,
INCORPORATED;
TRANSPORTATION
INSURANCE;
DIRECTOR,
OFFICE
OF
WORKERS'
COMPENSATION
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(15-0436)

Submitted:

February 28, 2017

Decided:

March 14, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Hanley, Andrew Penny, CROSSLEY MCINTOSH COLLIER HANLEY &
EDES,
PLLC,
Wilmington,
North
Carolina,
for
Petitioner.
M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate
Solicitor, Mark Reinhalter, Counsel for Longshore, Sean G.
Bajkowski, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Matthew W. Boyle,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for
Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1891

Doc: 46

Filed: 03/14/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Glenn

A.

Stewart

Board’s

decision

judge’s

denial

and

of

seeks
order

review
affirming

longshore

33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2012).

of

the

the

disability

Benefits

Review

administrative

benefits

pursuant

law
to

Our review of the record discloses

that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and
is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny the petition

for review for the reasons stated by the Board.

Stewart v.

Riverside Tech., Inc., No. 15-0436 (B.R.B. June 6, 2016).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2