Glenn Stewart v. Riverside Technology, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 15-0436 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000041849].. [16-1891]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1891 Doc: 46 Filed: 03/14/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1891 GLENN A. STEWART, Petitioner, v. RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED; TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (15-0436) Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 14, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Hanley, Andrew Penny, CROSSLEY MCINTOSH COLLIER HANLEY & EDES, PLLC, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Petitioner. M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate Solicitor, Mark Reinhalter, Counsel for Longshore, Sean G. Bajkowski, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Matthew W. Boyle, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1891 Doc: 46 Filed: 03/14/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Glenn A. Stewart Board’s decision judge’s denial and of seeks order review affirming longshore 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2012). of the the disability Benefits Review administrative benefits pursuant law to Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Stewart v. Riverside Tech., Inc., No. 15-0436 (B.R.B. June 6, 2016). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?