Glenn Stewart v. Riverside Technology, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 15-0436 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-1891]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GLENN A. STEWART,
PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
February 28, 2017
March 14, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Hanley, Andrew Penny, CROSSLEY MCINTOSH COLLIER HANLEY &
M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate
Solicitor, Mark Reinhalter, Counsel for Longshore, Sean G.
Bajkowski, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Matthew W. Boyle,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2012).
Our review of the record discloses
that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and
is without reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
Riverside Tech., Inc., No. 15-0436 (B.R.B. June 6, 2016).
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?