Fatmata Kamara v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000018536]. Mailed to: F Kamara M Kamara. [16-1901]
Appeal: 16-1901
Doc: 13
Filed: 02/07/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1901
FATMATA KAMARA; MOHAMED KAMARA,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.; HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; COMMONWEALTH TRUSTEES, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Before DUNCAN
Circuit Judge.
and
WYNN,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
February 7, 2017
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fatmata Kamara; Mohamed Kamara, Appellants Pro Se.
Ryan Van
Patten
Dougherty,
MCGUIREWOODS,
LLP,
Norfolk,
Virginia;
Nathaniel
Patrick
Lee,
MCGUIREWOODS,
LLP,
Tysons
Corner,
Virginia; Ruhi Fatima Mirza, Sara Nicholson Tussey, ROSENBERG &
ASSOCIATES, LLC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1901
Doc: 13
Filed: 02/07/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Fatmata
Kamara
court’s
order
motions
to
and
granting
dismiss
Mohamed
Kamara
Defendants’
their
amended
Fed.
civil
appeal
R.
the
Civ.
district
P.
12(b)(6)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Kamara
(E.D.
v.
Va.
Nationstar
July
15,
Mortg.,
2016).
LLC,
We
No.
dispense
have
See
1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?