Fatmata Kamara v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000018536]. Mailed to: F Kamara M Kamara. [16-1901]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1901 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/07/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1901 FATMATA KAMARA; MOHAMED KAMARA, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; HSBC BANK USA, N.A.; COMMONWEALTH TRUSTEES, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Before DUNCAN Circuit Judge. and WYNN, Circuit Decided: Judges, and February 7, 2017 DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatmata Kamara; Mohamed Kamara, Appellants Pro Se. Ryan Van Patten Dougherty, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Ruhi Fatima Mirza, Sara Nicholson Tussey, ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1901 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/07/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Fatmata Kamara court’s order motions to and granting dismiss Mohamed Kamara Defendants’ their amended Fed. civil appeal R. the Civ. district P. 12(b)(6) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kamara (E.D. v. Va. Nationstar July 15, Mortg., 2016). LLC, We No. dispense have See 1:16-cv-00415-LMB-MSN with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?