Yuri Stoyanov v. Charles Behrle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:07-cv-01985-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999976673]. Mailed to: Yuri Stoyanov. [16-1910]

Appeal: 16-1910

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/29/2016

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1910

YURI J. STOYANOV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES BEHRLE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
the Head of the Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN,
Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of
Code 70; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as the Head of Code 74; BRUCE CROCK, Individually
and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 743; DAVID
CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
Assistant Counsel Code 39; CATHERINE KISSMEIER, Individually
and in her Official Capacity as Counsel Code 40; GARTH
JENSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy
Head Code 70; MARY (CATHY) FOWLER, Individually and in her
Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code 70; KENNETH
FORMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of
Code 73; KENNETH GOLDMAN, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as Head of Code 71; ARCHER MACY, Individually and
in His Official Capacity as the Head of Naval Surface
Warfare Center; RAY MABUS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (1:07-cv-01985-DKC)

Submitted:

November 22, 2016

Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

November 29, 2016

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Appeal: 16-1910

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/29/2016

Pg: 2 of 3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1910

Doc: 15

Filed: 11/29/2016

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Yuri
entered

J.

Stoyanov

after

the

appeals

district

the

court

district

orders

Stoyanov’s

dismissed

court’s

claims

against Defendants, including claims brought pursuant to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e

to

Employment
(2012).
error.

2000e-17

Act

of

(2012),

1967,

as

and

the

amended,

Age

Discrimination

29 U.S.C.

§§ 621

to

in
634

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.

See

Stoyanov v. Behrle, No. 1:07-cv-01985-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2015
& June 13, 2016).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3