Yuri Stoyanov v. Charles Behrle

Filing

Case reopened upon grant of rehearing/rehearing en banc. Originating case number: 1:07-cv-01985-DKC. [16-1910]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1910 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/31/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 FILED: January 31, 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 16-1910 (1:07-cv-01985-DKC) ___________________ YURI J. STOYANOV, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES BEHRLE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of the Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74; BRUCE CROCK, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 743; DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39; CATHERINE KISSMEIER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Counsel Code 40; GARTH JENSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Head Code 70; MARY (CATHY) FOWLER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code 70; KENNETH FORMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 73; KENNETH GOLDMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of Code 71; ARCHER MACY, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Head of Naval Surface Warfare Center; RAY MABUS, Defendants - Appellees. ___________________ ORDER ___________________ Appeal: 16-1910 Doc: 22 Filed: 01/31/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 Yuri J. Stoyanov petitions for en banc rehearing. Upon consideration, the court grants panel rehearing. The clerk is directed to assign a new panel on rehearing of this case. As no judge in active service has requested a poll on the petition for en banc rehearing, the court denies the petition. For the Court /s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?