Yuri Stoyanov v. Charles Behrle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:07-cv-01985-DKC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000034914]. Mailed to: Yuri Stoyanov. [16-1910]

Appeal: 16-1910

Doc: 27

Filed: 03/03/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

ON REHEARING
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1910

YURI J. STOYANOV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES BEHRLE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
the Head of the Carderock Division; GARY M. JEBSEN,
Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of
Code 70; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as the Head of Code 74; BRUCE CROCK, Individually
and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 743; DAVID
CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as
Assistant Counsel Code 39; CATHERINE KISSMEIER, Individually
and in her Official Capacity as Counsel Code 40; GARTH
JENSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy
Head Code 70; MARY (CATHY) FOWLER, Individually and in her
Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Code 70; KENNETH
FORMAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Head of
Code 73; KENNETH GOLDMAN, Individually and in his Official
Capacity as Head of Code 71; ARCHER MACY, Individually and
in His Official Capacity as the Head of Naval Surface
Warfare Center; SEAN J. STACKLEY, Acting Secretary of the
Navy,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (1:07-cv-01985-DKC)

Submitted:

February 6, 2017

Decided:

March 3, 2017

Appeal: 16-1910

Doc: 27

Filed: 03/03/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se.
Allen F. Loucks, Kelly
Marie Marzullo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-1910

Doc: 27

Filed: 03/03/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Yuri
entered

J.

Stoyanov

after

the

appeals

district

the

court

district

dismissed

court’s

orders

Stoyanov’s

claims

against Defendants, including claims brought pursuant to Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e

to

Employment
(2012).
orders,

2000e-17

Act

of

(2012),

1967,

as

and

the

amended,

Age

Discrimination

29 U.S.C.

§§ 621

to

in
634

Although we previously affirmed the district court’s
we

subsequently

granted

panel

rehearing

and

denied

rehearing en banc.
We have again reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

See Stoyanov v. Behrle, No. 1:07-cv-01985-DKC

(D. Md. Aug. 26, 2015 & June 13, 2016).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3