Lenir Richardson v. O. J. Faulk


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999908254-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000000047]. Mailed to: Lenir Richardson Suite 1230 4901 Seminary Road Alexandria, VA 22311. [16-1911]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1911 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/09/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1911 LENIR RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge #2908; D. N. CUSTER, Officer, badge #3756; OFFICER RIZZA; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; MARIO TORRES, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB) Submitted: December 9, 2016 Decided: January 9, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Pace Baucom, Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1911 Doc: 11 Filed: 01/09/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lenir Richardson appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to remand and dismissing her complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Faulk, No. 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2015; July 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?