Lenir Richardson v. O. J. Faulk
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999908254-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000000047]. Mailed to: Lenir Richardson Suite 1230 4901 Seminary Road Alexandria, VA 22311. [16-1911]
Appeal: 16-1911
Doc: 11
Filed: 01/09/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1911
LENIR RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
O. J. FAULK, Officer, badge #2908; D. N. CUSTER, Officer,
badge #3756; OFFICER RIZZA; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY; MARIO
TORRES, Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB)
Submitted:
December 9, 2016
Decided:
January 9, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.
Kimberly Pace Baucom,
Assistant County Attorney, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1911
Doc: 11
Filed: 01/09/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lenir Richardson appeals the district court’s orders denying
her motion to remand and dismissing her complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We have
Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Faulk,
No. 1:15-cv-01489-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2015; July 13, 2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?